GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 4670

Place in the ranking	1114	437
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	no data
Power efficiency	1.15	9.68
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	RV730	GP107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 September 2008 (16 years ago)	3 January 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$67	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	640
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1190 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1328 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	59 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.00	53.12
Floating-point processing power	0.48 TFLOPS	1.7 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	32	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	193 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	112.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4670 0.98

GTX 1050 Max-Q 10.53
+974%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4670 378

GTX 1050 Max-Q 4047
+971%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −1025%	45 +1025%
1440p	2−3 −1250%	27 +1250%
4K	1−2 −1400%	15 +1400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	16.75	no data
1440p	33.50	no data
4K	67.00	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	39 +0%	39 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
Valorant	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Dota 2	68 +0%	68 +0%
Far Cry 5	65 +0%	65 +0%
Fortnite	47 +0%	47 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 +0%	45 +0%
Metro Exodus	26 +0%	26 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	127 +0%	127 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 +0%	13 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	26 +0%	26 +0%
World of Tanks	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Dota 2	104 +0%	104 +0%
Far Cry 5	51 +0%	51 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	26 +0%	26 +0%
Valorant	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
World of Tanks	94 +0%	94 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	33 +0%	33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	24 +0%	24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	28 +0%	28 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	28 +0%	28 +0%
Metro Exodus	7 +0%	7 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	37 +0%	37 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +0%	28 +0%
World of Tanks	53 +0%	53 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	37 +0%	37 +0%
Far Cry 5	16 +0%	16 +0%
Fortnite	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

This is how ATI HD 4670 and GTX 1050 Max-Q compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 Max-Q is 1025% faster in 1080p
GTX 1050 Max-Q is 1250% faster in 1440p
GTX 1050 Max-Q is 1400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.98	10.53
Recency	10 September 2008	3 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	59 Watt	75 Watt

ATI HD 4670 has 27.1% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 974.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4670 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.