Quadro FX 1700 vs ATI Radeon HD 4570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4570 with Quadro FX 1700, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4570
2008
1 GB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.47

FX 1700 outperforms HD 4570 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13011285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.440.95
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV710G84
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 November 2008 (17 years ago)12 September 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8032
Core clock speed650 MHz460 MHz
Number of transistors242 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt42 Watt
Texture fill rate5.2007.360
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPS0.05888 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4570 0.47
FX 1700 0.52
+10.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4570 198
FX 1700 216
+9.1%
Samples: 553

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.52
Recency 25 November 2008 12 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 42 Watt

ATI HD 4570 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 68% lower power consumption.

FX 1700, on the other hand, has a 10.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro FX 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4570 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 1700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4570
Radeon HD 4570
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4570 or Quadro FX 1700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.