Radeon HD 8330 vs HD 4550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

ATI HD 4550
2008
256 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.61

HD 8330 outperforms HD 4550 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11631142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameRV710Kabini
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2008 (15 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59 no data
Current price$116 (2x MSRP)$143

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 4550 and HD 8330 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80128
Core clock speed600 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors242 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8003.976
Floating-point performance96 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 4550 and Radeon HD 8330 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1310 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth10.48 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4550 0.61
HD 8330 0.67
+9.8%

HD 8330 outperforms HD 4550 by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 4550 235
HD 8330 260
+10.6%

HD 8330 outperforms HD 4550 by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−10%
11
+10%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.67
Recency 30 September 2008 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 4550 and Radeon HD 8330.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4550 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8330 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4550
Radeon HD 4550
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Radeon HD 8330

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 99 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 160 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.