Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs ATI HD 4350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4350 4350 AGP 4350 PCI 4350 PCIe x1 4450 4520 4550 4570
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Steam Deck 8CU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4350 with Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4350
2008
512 MB DDR3, 20 Watt
0.39

Steam Deck 8CU outperforms HD 4350 by a whopping 2521% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI HD 4350 HD 4350
Steam Deck 8CU Steam Deck 8CU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1334485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.50no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV710RDNA 2 Sephiroth
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2008 (17 years ago)9 November 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80512
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.800no data
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache16 KB512 KB
L2 Cache64 KB1 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−300%
28
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Valorant 24−27
−273%
95−100
+273%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−927%
150−160
+927%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Valorant 24−27
−273%
95−100
+273%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Valorant 24−27
−273%
95−100
+273%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−7800%
75−80
+7800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 21−24

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4350 and Steam Deck 8CU compete in popular games:

  • Steam Deck 8CU is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Steam Deck 8CU is 7800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Steam Deck 8CU performs better in 25 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 31 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.39 10.22
Recency 30 September 2008 9 November 2023
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm

Steam Deck 8CU has a 2520.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4350 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI HD 4350 Radeon HD 4350
vs
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
Steam Deck 8CU Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
ATI HD 4350 Radeon HD 4350
vs
8400 GS GeForce 8400 GS
9500M G GeForce 9500M G
vs
RX 5300 XT 5300 XT
HD 6430M AMD HD 6430M
vs
RTX A4500 Max-Q A4500 Max-Q
ATI Mobility HD 5430 ATI Radeon HD 5430
vs
GTX 1070 GDDR5X 1070 GDDR5X
HD 6350M AMD HD 6350M
vs
128 MB
ATI Mobility HD 4350 ATI Radeon HD 4350
vs
R7 360 896SP 360 896SP
GeForce 305M GeForce 305M
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI 128 PCI
GeForce 305M GeForce 305M
vs
L20
ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 ATI FireGL V5200
vs
HD 6770M Mac Edition 6770M Mac Edition
G 110M NVIDIA G 110M
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 5000 Ada Generation
9400M GeForceBoost GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
vs
RX 570X 570X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 233 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Radeon Steam Deck 8CU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4350 or Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.