Radeon R7 M465X vs ATI HD 4350

Place in the ranking	1272	652
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.27	no data
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	RV710	Tropo
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	30 September 2008 (16 years ago)	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	512
Core clock speed	600 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	925 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	4.800	29.60
Floating-point processing power	0.096 TFLOPS	0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	16
TMUs	8	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4350 0.37

R7 M465X 4.62
+1149%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4350 142

R7 M465X 1780
+1154%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1067%

70−75
+1067%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−1100%

24−27
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −971%	300−310 +971%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −971%	300−310 +971%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −971%	300−310 +971%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1100%

24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1100%

24−27
+1100%

This is how ATI HD 4350 and R7 M465X compete in popular games:

R7 M465X is 1067% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.37	4.62
Recency	30 September 2008	15 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	28 nm

R7 M465X has a 1148.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M465X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4350 is a desktop card while Radeon R7 M465X is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.