GeForce 6200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

Place in the ranking	1276	1457
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.29	no data
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	RV710	NV43
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 September 2008 (16 years ago)	11 October 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$39.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	no data
Core clock speed	600 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	146 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	4.800	1.200
Floating-point processing power	0.096 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	2
TMUs	8	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	no data	190 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	128 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	275 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DisplayPort

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	4.1	3.0
OpenGL	3.3	2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4350 0.37
+270%

GeForce 6200 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4350 145
+292%

GeForce 6200 37

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

6
+500%

1−2

−500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

39.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
World of Tanks	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Valorant	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Dota 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Valorant	1−2	0−1

This is how ATI HD 4350 and GeForce 6200 compete in popular games:

ATI HD 4350 is 500% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.37	0.10
Recency	30 September 2008	11 October 2004
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	128 MB
Chip lithography	55 nm	110 nm

ATI HD 4350 has a 270% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 4350 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.