Arc A770 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

Place in the ranking	1279	155
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	55.25
Power efficiency	1.29	10.50
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	RV710	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 September 2008 (16 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	4096
Core clock speed	600 MHz	2100 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.800	614.4
Floating-point processing power	0.096 TFLOPS	19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	128
TMUs	8	256
Tensor Cores	no data	512
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4350 0.36

Arc A770 33.07
+9086%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4350 145

Arc A770 13167
+8981%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4350 688

Arc A770 103295
+14914%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6 −1767%	112 +1767%
1440p	0−1	64
4K	-0−1	41

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.94
1440p	no data	5.14
4K	no data	8.02

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −955%	116 +955%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2300%	70−75 +2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −800%	99 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2300%	70−75 +2300%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −4967%	304 +4967%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1625%	65−70 +1625%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −700%	88 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2300%	70−75 +2300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −788%	71 +788%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −4200%	258 +4200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2600%	180−190 +2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1625%	65−70 +1625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −2260%	110−120 +2260%
World of Tanks	14−16 −1886%	270−280 +1886%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −655%	83 +655%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2300%	70−75 +2300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −3500%	216 +3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2600%	180−190 +2600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −867%	27−30 +867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −8650%	170−180 +8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1000%	30−35 +1000%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2625%	100−110 +2625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1400%	60 +1400%
Valorant	5−6 −1940%	100−110 +1940%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −220%	48 +220%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −220%	48 +220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −10700%	100−110 +10700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −220%	48 +220%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	35−40
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Dota 2	14−16 −8900%	1350−1400 +8900%
Valorant	1−2 −5100%	50−55 +5100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	120 +0%	120 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Dota 2	105 +0%	105 +0%
Fortnite	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	105 +0%	105 +0%
Metro Exodus	99 +0%	99 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	45 +0%	45 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 +0%	45 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
World of Tanks	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	158 +0%	158 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	91 +0%	91 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10 +0%	10 +0%
Metro Exodus	47 +0%	47 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	15 +0%	15 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Fortnite	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	89 +0%	89 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

This is how ATI HD 4350 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

Arc A770 is 1767% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 10700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc A770 is ahead in 31 test (51%)
there's a draw in 30 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.36	33.07
Recency	30 September 2008	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	225 Watt

ATI HD 4350 has 1025% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 9086.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.