GeForce RTX 5060 vs ATI Radeon HD 4270

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4270 with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4270
2010
512 MB
0.28

RTX 5060 outperforms ATI HD 4270 by a whopping 7432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1351269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.52
ArchitectureRV6xx (2008−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRS880MGB206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2010 (14 years ago)March 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores404608
Core clock speed590 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data362.9
Floating-point processing powerno data23.22 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4270 0.28
RTX 5060 21.09
+7432%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4270 109
RTX 5060 8125
+7354%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Valorant 24−27
−462%
140−150
+462%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1708%
230−240
+1708%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Dota 2 9−10
−7122%
650−700
+7122%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Valorant 24−27
−462%
140−150
+462%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Dota 2 9−10
−7122%
650−700
+7122%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Valorant 24−27
−462%
140−150
+462%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8550%
170−180
+8550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 18−20
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 45−50

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 16−18
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−140%
35−40
+140%
Valorant 2−3
−5550%
110−120
+5550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5060 is 8550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is ahead in 31 test (53%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 21.09
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

RTX 5060 has a 7432.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4270 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4270 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4270
Radeon HD 4270
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 405 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4270 or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.