GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 4270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4270 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4270
2010
512 MB
0.25

1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms HD 4270 by a whopping 4696% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1406425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.89
ArchitectureRV6xx (2008−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRS880MGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2010 (15 years ago)3 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40768
Core clock speed590 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1417 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data68.02
Floating-point processing powerno data2.177 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4270 0.25
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 11.99
+4696%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4270 109
Samples: 25
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5303
+4765%
Samples: 1912

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4270 230
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 29504
+12728%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
1440p0−129
4K-0−119

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Valorant 24−27
−331%
110−120
+331%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1285%
180−190
+1285%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 9−10
−989%
98
+989%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−820%
46
+820%
Valorant 24−27
−331%
110−120
+331%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 9−10
−944%
94
+944%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−400%
25
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−331%
110−120
+331%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3700%
110−120
+3700%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 18−20

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−140%
36
+140%
Valorant 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+0%
57
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4270 and GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 5600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 3700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q performs better in 29 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 36 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 11.99
Recency 1 May 2010 3 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q has a 4696% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4270 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4270
Radeon HD 4270
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 113 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4270 or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.