GeForce 315 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRV6xx (2008−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRS880MGT216
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2010 (15 years ago)31 March 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4048
Core clock speed590 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistorsno data486 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data33 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1056 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data790 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.64 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 31 March 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm

ATI HD 4270 has an age advantage of 1 month.

315 OEM, on the other hand, has a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4270 and GeForce 315 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4270 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 315 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4270
Radeon HD 4270
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
GeForce 315 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 315 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4270 or GeForce 315 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.