GeForce2 MX 200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameM74NV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)3 March 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed600 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors180 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate2.4000.7
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs44
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s1.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

ATI Mobility HD 2400 XT has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT and GeForce2 MX 200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX 200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200
GeForce2 MX 200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 34 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT or GeForce2 MX 200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.