GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

Place in the ranking	1319	132
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.88	21.90
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	RV620	TU104B
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 February 2009 (15 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	40	2560
Core clock speed	594 MHz	1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1380 MHz
Number of transistors	181 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.376	220.8
Floating-point processing power	0.04752 TFLOPS	7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	4	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	396 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.336 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4250 0.32

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 36.58
+11331%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4250 227

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 70601
+31002%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −11800%	119 +11800%
1440p	0−1	75
4K	-0−1	45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2467%	75−80 +2467%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2467%	75−80 +2467%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2800%	170−180 +2800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2875%	119 +2875%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2467%	75−80 +2467%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1300%	84 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2800%	170−180 +2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −3150%	190−200 +3150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1400%	60 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −2460%	120−130 +2460%
World of Tanks	12−14 −2046%	270−280 +2046%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2467%	75−80 +2467%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1467%	90−95 +1467%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2800%	170−180 +2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −3150%	190−200 +3150%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−8650%

170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	30−33
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1100%	35−40 +1100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2850%	110−120 +2850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1450%	60−65 +1450%
Valorant	4−5 −2850%	118 +2850%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −229%	21−24 +229%
Dota 2	14−16 −367%	70−75 +367%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −367%	70−75 +367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −367%	70−75 +367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	46
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −229%	21−24 +229%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Dota 2	14−16 −367%	70−75 +367%
Valorant	0−1	62

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	99 +0%	99 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	111 +0%	111 +0%
Valorant	172 +0%	172 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Dota 2	129 +0%	129 +0%
Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	129 +0%	129 +0%
Metro Exodus	85 +0%	85 +0%
Valorant	113 +0%	113 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	83 +0%	83 +0%
Dota 2	124 +0%	124 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Valorant	163 +0%	163 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	38 +0%	38 +0%
World of Tanks	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	79 +0%	79 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	89 +0%	89 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus	32 +0%	32 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	25 +0%	25 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Fortnite	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

This is how ATI HD 4250 and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 11800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 11600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
there's a draw in 29 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.32	36.58
Recency	25 February 2009	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	115 Watt

ATI HD 4250 has 360% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 11331.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.