GeForce GT 640 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4250 and GeForce GT 640 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4250
2009
512 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.28

640 OEM outperforms HD 4250 by a whopping 421% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13851003
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.912.37
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV620GK107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 February 2009 (16 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40384
Core clock speed594 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors181 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.37625.50
Floating-point processing power0.04752 TFLOPS0.6121 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs432
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.336 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Valorant 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Valorant 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Valorant 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 1.46
Recency 25 February 2009 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 4250 has 100% lower power consumption.

GT 640 OEM, on the other hand, has a 421.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 640 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4250 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GeForce GT 640 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4250 or GeForce GT 640 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.