ATI Radeon X800 PRO vs ATI HD 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4200 and Radeon X800 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4200
2009
0.28
+75%

ATI HD 4200 outperforms ATI X800 PRO by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13471424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.23
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRS880R423
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 August 2009 (15 years ago)1 May 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed500 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors181 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data48 Watt
Texture fill rate2.0005.700
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPSno data
ROPs412
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4200 0.28
+75%
ATI X800 PRO 0.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4200 111
+73.4%
ATI X800 PRO 64

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Valorant 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Valorant 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.16
Recency 1 August 2009 1 May 2004
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm

ATI HD 4200 has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 PRO in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4200
Radeon HD 4200
ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 275 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4200 or Radeon X800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.