Radeon Pro W6600M vs ATI HD 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4200 with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4200
2009
0.26

Pro W6600M outperforms ATI HD 4200 by a whopping 10258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1391232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.79
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRS880Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 August 2009 (16 years ago)8 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401792
Core clock speed500 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2034 MHz
Number of transistors181 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data90 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000227.8
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.02.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4200 0.26
Pro W6600M 26.93
+10258%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4200 111
Pro W6600M 11287
+10068%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
God of War 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
God of War 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
Valorant 24−27
−620%
180−190
+620%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1969%
260−270
+1969%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Dota 2 9−10
−1333%
120−130
+1333%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
God of War 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Valorant 24−27
−620%
180−190
+620%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Dota 2 9−10
−1333%
120−130
+1333%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
God of War 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Valorant 24−27
−620%
180−190
+620%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 65−70

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−253%
50−55
+253%
Valorant 2−3
−8050%
160−170
+8050%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
God of War 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
God of War 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 8050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 29 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 26.93
Recency 1 August 2009 8 June 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm

Pro W6600M has a 10257.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4200
Radeon HD 4200
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 304 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4200 or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.