GeForce 9500M GS vs ATI Radeon HD 4200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 4200 with GeForce 9500M GS, including specs and performance data.
9500M GS outperforms ATI HD 4200 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1347 | 1306 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 1.21 |
Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
GPU code name | RS880 | G84 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 August 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 February 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 475 MHz |
Number of transistors | 181 million | 289 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 20 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 2.000 | 7.600 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.04 TFLOPS | 0.0608 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 4 | 8 |
TMUs | 4 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 22.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | - | 1.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Atomic Heart | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Atomic Heart | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the 9500M GS is 11% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- 9500M GS is ahead in 3 tests (9%)
- there's a draw in 30 tests (91%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.28 | 0.34 |
Recency | 1 August 2009 | 1 February 2008 |
Chip lithography | 55 nm | 80 nm |
ATI HD 4200 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.
9500M GS, on the other hand, has a 21.4% higher aggregate performance score.
The GeForce 9500M GS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop card while GeForce 9500M GS is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.