Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs HD 3870

Aggregated performance score

ATI HD 3870
2007
512 MB GDDR4
1.43
+160%

HD 3870 outperforms HD 2600 PRO by 160% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9461174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.03no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV670RV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 November 2007 (16 years ago)28 June 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data
Current price$195 (0.7x MSRP)$100

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 3870 and ATI HD 2600 PRO have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320120
Core clock speed777 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors666 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate12.434.800
Floating-point performance497.3 gflops144 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2252 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72.06 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 3870 1.43
+160%
ATI HD 2600 PRO 0.55

HD 3870 outperforms HD 2600 PRO by 160% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 3870 555
+163%
ATI HD 2600 PRO 211

HD 3870 outperforms HD 2600 PRO by 163% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.43 0.55
Recency 19 November 2007 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 35 Watt

The Radeon HD 3870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 PRO in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3870
Radeon HD 3870
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 121 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 222 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.