Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs ATI HD 3850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3850 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 3850
2007, $179
1 GB GDDR3, 75 Watt
0.97
RX 9060 XT 16 GB
2025, $349
16 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
48.54
+4904%

9060 XT 16 GB outperforms HD 3850 by a whopping 4904% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117576
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0482.75
Power efficiency0.9923.10
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRV670Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)4 June 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 206775% better value for money than ATI HD 3850.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Core clock speed668 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3130 MHz
Number of transistors666 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate10.69400.6
Floating-point processing power0.4275 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length208 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed830 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth53.12 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3850 0.97
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 48.54
+4904%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3850 401
Samples: 816
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 20091
+4910%
Samples: 6830

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−5200%
159
+5200%
1440p1−2
−7000%
71
+7000%
4K0−143

Cost per frame, $

1080p59.67
−2618%
2.19
+2618%
1440p179.00
−3542%
4.92
+3542%
4Kno data8.12
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 2618% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 3542% lower cost per frame in 1440p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 270
+0%
270
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 248
+0%
248
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 273
+0%
273
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 233
+0%
233
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how ATI HD 3850 and RX 9060 XT 16 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 5200% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 7000% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 48.54
Recency 19 November 2007 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 160 Watt

ATI HD 3850 has 113% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 4904% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 222 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1966 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3850 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.