Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs HD 3850

Place in performance ranking	1067	765
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.37	0.97
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	no data
GPU code name	RV670	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	19 November 2007 (16 years ago)	1 August 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	no data
Current price	$30 (0.2x MSRP)	$105

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics has 162% better value for money than ATI HD 3850.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	640
Core clock speed	668 MHz	720 / 825 MHz
Number of transistors	666 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	10.69	no data
Floating-point performance	427.5 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 3850 and Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Length	208 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1660 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	53.12 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	11
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
−140%

12−14

+140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−167%

16−18

+167%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Hitman 3	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−167%

16−18

+167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1