GeForce 320M vs ATI Radeon HD 3750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.51
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV635C89
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)1 April 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12048
Core clock speed796 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors378 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate6.3687.200
Floating-point processing power0.191 TFLOPS0.0912 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed693 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.18 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 1 April 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 23 Watt

GeForce 320M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 182.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3750 and GeForce 320M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3750 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 320M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3750
Radeon HD 3750
NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 68 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3750 or GeForce 320M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.