Quadro 600 vs ATI Radeon HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3650 with Quadro 600, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 3650
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.36

600 outperforms ATI HD 3650 by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13111063
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Power efficiency0.422.38
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV635GF108
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 January 2008 (17 years ago)13 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12096
Core clock speed725 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors378 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate5.80010.24
Floating-point processing power0.174 TFLOPS0.2458 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3650 0.36
Quadro 600 1.25
+247%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3650 150
Quadro 600 524
+249%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 1.25
Recency 20 January 2008 13 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro 600 has a 247.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3650 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3650
Radeon HD 3650
NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 95 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 457 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3650 or Quadro 600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.