GeForce 410M vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

Place in the ranking	1381	1226
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.71	4.06
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	RV620	GF119
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	23 January 2008 (17 years ago)	5 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	40	48
Core clock speed	800 MHz	575 MHz
Number of transistors	181 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.200	4.600
Floating-point processing power	0.064 TFLOPS	0.1104 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	73
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	4	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	Up to 512 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	950 MHz	Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth	15.2 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

no data

8.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	+
OpenCL	N/A	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3470 0.28

GeForce 410M 0.64
+129%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3470 117

GeForce 410M 269
+130%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

3−4

−167%

8
+167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
God of War	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
God of War	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
God of War	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
God of War	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how ATI HD 3470 and GeForce 410M compete in popular games:

GeForce 410M is 167% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 32 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.28	0.64
Recency	23 January 2008	5 January 2011
Chip lithography	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	12 Watt

GeForce 410M has a 128.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 410M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3470 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 410M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon HD 3470

GeForce 410M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

2600 XT Mac Edition

NVIDIA GTX 1060 5 GB

2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD Instinct MI350X

X1050 AGP

AMD RX 5600 OEM

X1650

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 55 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3 323 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3470 or GeForce 410M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.