GeForce 8200M G vs ATI Radeon HD 3450

Place in the ranking	1388	1478
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.90	no data
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	no data
GPU code name	RV620	MCP77MV MCP79MVL
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 December 2007 (17 years ago)	3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	40	8
Core clock speed	600 MHz	400 MHz
Number of transistors	181 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	2.400	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.048 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	4	no data
L2 Cache	64 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	no data
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	10
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3450 0.29
+93.3%

8200M G 0.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3450 121
+86.2%

Samples: 1399

8200M G 65
Samples: 366

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 30 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.29	0.15
Recency	10 December 2007	3 June 2008
Chip lithography	55 nm	80 nm

ATI HD 3450 has a 93.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

8200M G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The Radeon HD 3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3450 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8200M G is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon HD 3450

GeForce 8200M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

Instinct MI300X

Radeon X1600 XT

Ti 4400

Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 146 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3450 or GeForce 8200M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.