Radeon HD 6310 vs ATI HD 3200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3200 with Radeon HD 6310, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 3200
2008
0.21

HD 6310 outperforms ATI HD 3200 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13911325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.21
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRS780Loveland
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 March 2008 (16 years ago)9 November 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4080
Core clock speed494 MHz276 MHz
Number of transistors180 million450 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate1.9762.208
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPS0.04416 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.01.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3200 0.21
HD 6310 0.31
+47.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3200 82
HD 6310 122
+48.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 3200 82
HD 6310 691
+748%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

This is how ATI HD 3200 and HD 6310 compete in popular games:

  • HD 6310 is 33% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the HD 6310 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6310 is ahead in 13 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.31
Recency 4 March 2008 9 November 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm

HD 6310 has a 47.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3200 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6310 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3200
Radeon HD 3200
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Radeon HD 6310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 269 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3200 or Radeon HD 6310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.