ATI Radeon E4690 vs ATI HD 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3200 and Radeon E4690, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 3200
2008
0.19

E4690 outperforms HD 3200 by a whopping 384% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14391148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.47
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRS780RV730
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40320
Core clock speed494 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors180 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate1.97619.20
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-II
WidthIGPMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)10.1
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.01.0
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3200 0.19
ATI E4690 0.92
+384%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3200 82
Samples: 1648
ATI E4690 405
+394%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3
−367%
14−16
+367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Valorant 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Valorant 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Valorant 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−367%
70−75
+367%
Valorant 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

This is how ATI HD 3200 and ATI E4690 compete in popular games:

  • ATI E4690 is 367% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 0.92
Recency 4 March 2008 1 June 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm

ATI E4690 has a 384.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon E4690 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3200
Radeon HD 3200
ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 86 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3200 or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.