HD Graphics P4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3200 and HD Graphics P4000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 3200
2008
0.20

HD Graphics P4000 outperforms HD 3200 by a whopping 515% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14591092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.10
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameRS780Ivy Bridge GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2008 (18 years ago)14 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40128
Core clock speed494 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors180 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate1.97620.00
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs41
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.0
OpenCL1.01.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 3200 0.20
HD Graphics P4000 1.23
+515%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3200 82
Samples: 1648
HD Graphics P4000 516
+529%
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3
−500%
18−20
+500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Valorant 24−27
−500%
150−160
+500%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−500%
150−160
+500%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−500%
150−160
+500%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Valorant 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

This is how ATI HD 3200 and HD Graphics P4000 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics P4000 is 500% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 1.23
Recency 4 March 2008 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm

HD Graphics P4000 has a 515% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 195% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics P4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3200 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 88 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 110 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3200 or HD Graphics P4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.