GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon HD 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated17
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data26.73
ArchitectureRV6xx (2007−2010)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameRS780MAD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599
Current price$260 $791 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores405888
Core clock speed500 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors181 Million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rate1.976455.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 3200 and GeForce RTX 4070 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared21000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 3200 82
RTX 4070 27008
+32837%

GeForce RTX 4070 outperforms Radeon HD 3200 by 32837% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 3200 82
RTX 4070 128530
+157606%

GeForce RTX 4070 outperforms Radeon HD 3200 by 157606% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3200 and GeForce RTX 4070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3200 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3200
Radeon HD 3200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 66 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7515 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.