GeForce GT 630 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 3200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 3200 and GeForce GT 630 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
630 OEM outperforms HD 3200 by a whopping 700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1451 | 992 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.46 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | RS780 | GK107 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 March 2008 (17 years ago) | 24 April 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 494 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 180 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.976 | 14.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.03952 TFLOPS | 0.336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 16 |
| TMUs | 4 | 16 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | IGP | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 891 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | - | 3.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3
−700%
| 24−27
+700%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−686%
|
55−60
+686%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−700%
|
200−210
+700%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−692%
|
95−100
+692%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−678%
|
70−75
+678%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−686%
|
55−60
+686%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−700%
|
40−45
+700%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−700%
|
200−210
+700%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−678%
|
70−75
+678%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−686%
|
55−60
+686%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−700%
|
40−45
+700%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−700%
|
200−210
+700%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−686%
|
110−120
+686%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
This is how ATI HD 3200 and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:
- GT 630 OEM is 700% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 1.60 |
| Recency | 4 March 2008 | 24 April 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
GT 630 OEM has a 700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GT 630 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
