GeForce 8400 SE vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 2900 XT and GeForce 8400 SE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 2900 XT
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 215 Watt
1.49
+893%

HD 2900 XT outperforms 8400 SE by a whopping 893% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9861464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.560.24
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR600G86S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)1 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed743 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistors720 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate11.893.672
Floating-point processing power0.4755 TFLOPS0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168
L2 Cache256 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 2900 XT 1.49
+893%
8400 SE 0.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 2900 XT 659
+869%
Samples: 27
8400 SE 68
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 0.15
Recency 14 May 2007 1 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 2900 XT has a 893.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

8400 SE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 330% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 2900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 SE in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
GeForce 8400 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2900 XT or GeForce 8400 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.