Radeon HD 2600 XT vs HD 2900 GT

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

ATI HD 2900 GT
2007
256 MB GDDR3
0.75
+2.7%

HD 2900 GT outperforms HD 2600 XT by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11131119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameR600RV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 November 2007 (16 years ago)28 June 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current priceno data$144 (0.7x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240120
Core clock speed601 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors720 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2126.400
Floating-point performance288.48 gflops192 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 2900 GT 0.75
+2.7%
ATI HD 2600 XT 0.73

HD 2900 GT outperforms HD 2600 XT by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 2900 GT 292
+3.5%
ATI HD 2600 XT 282

HD 2900 GT outperforms HD 2600 XT by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.75 0.73
Recency 6 November 2007 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 45 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 2900 GT and Radeon HD 2600 XT.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Radeon HD 2900 GT
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 2600 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 66 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.