Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs ATI HD 2600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 2600 PRO with Radeon Pro Vega 48, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 2600 PRO
2007
512 MB DDR2, 35 Watt
0.50

Pro 48 outperforms HD 2600 PRO by a whopping 5290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1292241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.10no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV630Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)19 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1203072
Core clock speed600 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors390 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.800249.6
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8192
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz786 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s402.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 2600 PRO 0.50
Pro Vega 48 26.95
+5290%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 2600 PRO 211
Samples: 300
Pro Vega 48 11269
+5241%
Samples: 17

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 26.95
Recency 28 June 2007 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm

Pro Vega 48 has a 5290% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 261 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 78 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2600 PRO or Radeon Pro Vega 48, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.