RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 2400 with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 2400
2008
256 MB DDR2, 20 Watt
0.27

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms HD 2400 by a whopping 16504% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking139280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0936.29
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV610AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date19 February 2008 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores405120
Core clock speed398 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors180 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate1.592247.2
Floating-point processing power0.03184 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cache32 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed495 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.92 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 2400 0.27
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 44.83
+16504%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 2400 120
Samples: 91
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19815
+16413%
Samples: 564

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 44.83
Recency 19 February 2008 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 100 Watt

ATI HD 2400 has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 16503.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2400 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400
Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 49 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 44 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2400 or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.