GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 2400 XT with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 2400 XT
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 25 Watt
0.30

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms ATI HD 2400 XT by a whopping 14980% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking133574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8427.63
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV610GA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores405632
Core clock speed650 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors180 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600248.2
Floating-point processing power0.052 TFLOPS15.88 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs4176
Tensor Coresno data176
Ray Tracing Coresno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 2400 XT 0.30
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 45.24
+14980%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 2400 XT 118
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 17804
+14988%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1121
1440p-0−172
4K-0−149

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 158
+0%
158
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95
+0%
95
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+0%
89
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 53
+0%
53
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 45.24
Recency 28 June 2007 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 115 Watt

ATI HD 2400 XT has 360% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14980% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2400 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2400 XT is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
Radeon HD 2400 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 908 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2400 XT or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.