ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP vs Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking729not rated
Place by popularity89not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameRaphaelRS480
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 September 2022 (3 years ago)8 November 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm110 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.200
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2022 8 November 2004
Chip lithography 6 nm 110 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Radeon Xpress 200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Xpress 200 IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
Radeon Xpress 200 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 311 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) or Radeon Xpress 200 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.