Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Arc A580

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking184not rated
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Power efficiency11.95no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDG2-512EXK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 October 2023 (1 year ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072384
Core clock speed1700 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate384.033.86
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs19232
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.01x DVI
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.0 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2023 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 45 Watt

Arc A580 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

K2000M Embedded, on the other hand, has 288.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A580 and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A580 is a desktop card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A580
Arc A580
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 285 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.