Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 684 | 960 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | Raphael | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 September 2022 (2 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 736 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 655 / 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1800 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 11 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- Other tests
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 60−65
+161%
| 23
−161%
|
| Full HD | 19
+11.8%
| 17
−11.8%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+167%
|
6−7
−167%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+167%
|
6−7
−167%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+300%
|
6−7
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+52.8%
|
35−40
−52.8%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+167%
|
6−7
−167%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+65.9%
|
44
−65.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Dota 2 | 41
+116%
|
18−20
−116%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+300%
|
6−7
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+71.4%
|
7−8
−71.4%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+52.8%
|
35−40
−52.8%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Dota 2 | 37
+94.7%
|
18−20
−94.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+71.4%
|
7−8
−71.4%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+52.8%
|
35−40
−52.8%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+300%
|
6−7
−300%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+400%
|
9−10
−400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+100%
|
5−6
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+163%
|
8−9
−163%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:
- Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 161% faster in 900p
- Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 12% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Graphics (Ryzen 7000) surpassed HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in all 49 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.26 | 1.61 |
| Recency | 26 September 2022 | 15 May 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has a 164.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
