Quadro K620 vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.34

Quadro K620 outperforms Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a substantial 33% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking634563
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.23
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameRaphaelGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 September 2022 (1 year ago)22 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189.89
Current priceno data$286 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128384
Core clock speedno data1058 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data41 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.98
Floating-point performanceno data863.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Quadro K620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno data128 Bit
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 29 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDVI-I DP
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212
Shader Modelno data5
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data+
CUDAno data5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Hitman 3 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Hitman 3 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Quadro K620 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K620 is 26% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.34 5.77
Recency 26 September 2022 22 July 2014
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm

The Quadro K620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while Quadro K620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 168 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 564 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.