GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and GeForce GTX 460M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.43

GTX 460M SLI outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking668637
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRaphaelN11E-GS
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)3 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128384
Core clock speedno data675 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2x1536 MB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Shared memory+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.43
GTX 460M SLI 4.97
+12.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 3026
GTX 460M SLI 3313
+9.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11703
GTX 460M SLI 14236
+21.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45−50
−15.6%
52
+15.6%
Full HD17
−271%
63
+271%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Elden Ring 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Valorant 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Elden Ring 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Fortnite 24−27
−11.5%
27−30
+11.5%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−10.5%
40−45
+10.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
World of Tanks 70−75
−9.5%
80−85
+9.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−10.5%
40−45
+10.5%
Valorant 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Elden Ring 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−10%
30−35
+10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
World of Tanks 30−35
−12.5%
35−40
+12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Elden Ring 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Valorant 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and GTX 460M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460M SLI is 16% faster in 900p
  • GTX 460M SLI is 271% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 131% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 460M SLI is 133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • GTX 460M SLI is ahead in 47 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 4.97
Recency 26 September 2022 3 September 2010
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460M SLI, on the other hand, has a 12.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GeForce GTX 460M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 257 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.