Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs Radeon Graphics 384SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameCezannePonte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 April 2021 (4 years ago)10 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416384
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate40.801,638
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs241024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128
L1 Cacheno data64 MB
L2 Cacheno data408 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2021 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 600 Watt

Graphics 384SP has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1550, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP and Data Center GPU Max 1550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop graphics card while Data Center GPU Max 1550 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
Data Center GPU Max 1550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 35 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 23 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 384SP or Data Center GPU Max 1550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.