Arctic Sound 2T vs Radeon Graphics 384SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameCezanneArctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 April 2021 (5 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847680 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate40.80216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs8120 ×2
TMUs24240 ×2
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.23 TB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 500 Watt

Graphics 384SP has a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 1011% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 384SP or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.