GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRenoirGF119
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (5 years ago)2 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32048
Core clock speed400 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate28.006.480
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs208
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x1
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 2 April 2012
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 29 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 7 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 93.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 15 votes

Rate GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.