ATI Radeon X1600 vs Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.34
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRenoirRV516
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (5 years ago)2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed400 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate28.002.540
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)3.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 27 Watt

Graphics 320SP has a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and Radeon X1600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP
ATI Radeon X1600
Radeon X1600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 83 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or Radeon X1600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.