GeForce 9300M G vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.18
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRenoirG86
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)1 February 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate28.003.200
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs208
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 1 February 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 1043% more advanced lithography process.

9300M G, on the other hand, has 15% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and GeForce 9300M G. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or GeForce 9300M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.