Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRenoirPonte Vecchio
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)10 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32014336
Core clock speed400 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate28.001,389
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS44.44 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs20896
Tensor Coresno data896
Ray Tracing Coresno data112
L1 Cacheno data56 MB
L2 Cacheno data408 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2,458 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 450 Watt

Graphics 320SP has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2900% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and Data Center GPU Max 1350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
Data Center GPU Max 1350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or Data Center GPU Max 1350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.