Radeon RX 7600M XT vs E8950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8950 R9 M295X R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M390X R9 M395X R9 M395X Mac Edition R9 M485X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600M 7600M XT 7600S 7700S 7800M 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E8950 and Radeon RX 7600M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon E8950
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 95 Watt
12.93

7600M XT outperforms E8950 by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking420160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.5522.44
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameAmethystNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 September 2015 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed735 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0316.0
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−193%
117
+193%
1440p21−24
−186%
60
+186%
4K12−14
−175%
33
+175%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 331
+0%
331
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
+0%
116
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 317
+0%
317
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+0%
96
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 245
+0%
245
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 192
+0%
192
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 237
+0%
237
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+0%
179
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+0%
133
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 186
+0%
186
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 120
+0%
120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 142
+0%
142
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+0%
74
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Radeon E8950 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 193% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 186% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 175% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.93 34.76
Recency 29 September 2015 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 120 Watt

Radeon E8950 has 26.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 168.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E8950 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon E8950
Radeon E8950
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
Arc A350M Arc A350M
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
Radeon E6465 AMD Radeon E6465
vs
Pro 570X Pro 570X
Radeon E6465 AMD Radeon E6465
vs
Pro 580X Pro 580X
Radeon E8870 AMD Radeon E8870
vs
Pro 575X Pro 575X
Radeon E8870 AMD Radeon E8870
vs
540 Mobile Radeon 540 Mobile
Radeon E8950 AMD Radeon E8950
vs
9600 GSO GeForce 9600 GSO
R7 M350 AMD Radeon R7 M350
vs
HD 6570M HD 6570M
R7 M350 AMD Radeon R7 M350
vs
HD 6390 HD 6390
R7 M350 AMD Radeon R7 M350
vs
ATI 9800 XXL Radeon 9800 XXL
R7 M365 AMD Radeon R7 M365
vs
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
R9 M360 AMD Radeon R9 M360
vs
RTX 3060 GA104 RTX 3060 GA104

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon E8950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 89 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E8950 or Radeon RX 7600M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.