GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Radeon E8950

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E8950 with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Radeon E8950
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 95 Watt
12.94

RTX 5070 Ti outperforms E8950 by a whopping 505% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3827
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.64
Power efficiency10.1119.37
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAmethystGB203
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)20 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488960
Core clock speed735 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2452 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0686.6
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS43.94 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs128280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−540%
224
+540%
1440p21−24
−533%
133
+533%
4K14−16
−529%
88
+529%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.34
1440pno data5.63
4Kno data8.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Valorant 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 240
+0%
240
+0%
Valorant 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 199
+0%
199
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 183
+0%
183
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Radeon E8950 and RTX 5070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti is 540% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 533% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 529% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.94 78.30
Recency 29 September 2015 20 February 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon E8950 has 215.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 505.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E8950 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon E8950 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8950
Radeon E8950
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon E8950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1120 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E8950 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.