GeForce GT 610 vs Radeon E8950

Place in performance ranking	370	1147
Place by popularity	not in top-100	85
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Amethyst	GF119
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 September 2015 (8 years ago)	2 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$39.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	48
CUDA cores	no data	48
Core clock speed	735 MHz	810 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,000 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	102 °C
Texture fill rate	128.0	6.480
Floating-point performance	4.096 gflops	0.1555 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width	MXM Module	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1024 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.17	0.80
Recency	29 September 2015	2 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1024 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	29 Watt

Radeon E8950 has a 1671.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 610, on the other hand, has 227.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon E8950 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 610 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.