GeForce RTX 4080 vs Radeon E8860

Place in performance ranking	633	3
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	17.31
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Venus	AD103-300-A1
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 January 2014 (10 years ago)	20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,199
Current price	no data	$1451 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	9728
Core clock speed	575 MHz	2205 MHz
Boost clock speed	625 MHz	2505 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	37 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.00	761.5
Floating-point performance	800.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	IGP	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	22400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon E8860 4.37

RTX 4080 89.61
+1951%

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon E8860 by 1951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon E8860 1686

RTX 4080 34611
+1953%

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon E8860 by 1953% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −2330%	243 +2330%
1440p	8−9 −2075%	174 +2075%
4K	5−6 −2140%	112 +2140%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

231

−1935%

4700−4750
+1935%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150 −1934%	2950−3000 +1934%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	262 −1942%	5350−5400 +1942%
Battlefield 5	240−250 −1949%	5000−5050 +1949%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −1942%	2450−2500 +1942%
Cyberpunk 2077	231 −1935%	4700−4750 +1935%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −1934%	2400−2450 +1934%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 −1940%	4100−4150 +1940%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 −1936%	5600−5650 +1936%
Hitman 3	120−130 −1933%	2500−2550 +1933%
Horizon Zero Dawn	478 −1950%	9800−9850 +1950%
Metro Exodus	150−160 −1939%	3100−3150 +1939%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −1916%	2500−2550 +1916%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	527 −1949%	10800−10850 +1949%
Watch Dogs: Legion	191 −1942%	3900−3950 +1942%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150 −1934%	2950−3000 +1934%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	217 −1928%	4400−4450 +1928%
Battlefield 5	240−250 −1949%	5000−5050 +1949%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −1942%	2450−2500 +1942%
Cyberpunk 2077	210 −1948%	4300−4350 +1948%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −1934%	2400−2450 +1934%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 −1940%	4100−4150 +1940%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 −1936%	5600−5650 +1936%
Hitman 3	120−130 −1933%	2500−2550 +1933%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 −1942%	7700−7750 +1942%
Metro Exodus	83 −1948%	1700−1750 +1948%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −1916%	2500−2550 +1916%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	512 −1941%	10450−10500 +1941%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	545 −1946%	11150−11200 +1946%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 −1920%	3050−3100 +1920%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150 −1934%	2950−3000 +1934%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	189 −1937%	3850−3900 +1937%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −1942%	2450−2500 +1942%
Cyberpunk 2077	190 −1926%	3850−3900 +1926%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −1934%	2400−2450 +1934%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 −1936%	5600−5650 +1936%
Horizon Zero Dawn	396 −1945%	8100−8150 +1945%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	480 −1942%	9800−9850 +1942%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	259 −1946%	5300−5350 +1946%
Watch Dogs: Legion	164 −1943%	3350−3400 +1943%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

−1916%

2500−2550
+1916%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 −1948%	3400−3450 +1948%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 −1949%	2950−3000 +1949%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −1945%	2250−2300 +1945%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	153 −1926%	3100−3150 +1926%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 −1909%	2250−2300 +1909%
Cyberpunk 2077	129 −1916%	2600−2650 +1916%
Far Cry 5	201 −1940%	4100−4150 +1940%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 −1945%	4950−5000 +1945%
Hitman 3	130−140 −1923%	2650−2700 +1923%
Horizon Zero Dawn	332 −1948%	6800−6850 +1948%
Metro Exodus	149 −1947%	3050−3100 +1947%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	390 −1938%	7950−8000 +1938%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	191 −1942%	3900−3950 +1942%
Watch Dogs: Legion	142 −1942%	2900−2950 +1942%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

−1916%

2600−2650
+1916%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 −1945%	1800−1850 +1945%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −1929%	1400−1450 +1929%
Hitman 3	80−85 −1948%	1700−1750 +1948%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −1932%	3150−3200 +1932%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133 −1930%	2700−2750 +1930%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	187 −1932%	3800−3850 +1932%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −1912%	1650−1700 +1912%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100 −1950%	2050−2100 +1950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −1919%	1050−1100 +1919%
Cyberpunk 2077	63 −1884%	1250−1300 +1884%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −1900%	1000−1050 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −1935%	4050−4100 +1935%
Horizon Zero Dawn	201 −1940%	4100−4150 +1940%
Metro Exodus	130 −1938%	2650−2700 +1938%
Watch Dogs: Legion	87 −1911%	1750−1800 +1911%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−1927%

2250−2300
+1927%

This is how Radeon E8860 and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 is 2330% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 is 2075% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 is 2140% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.37	89.61
Recency	25 January 2014	20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	37 Watt	320 Watt