GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon E8860

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Radeon E8860
2014
2 GB GDDR5
4.36
+38%

Radeon E8860 outperforms GeForce GTX 260 by 38% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking629710
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data0.36
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameVenusGT200
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 January 2014 (10 years ago)16 June 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current priceno data$49 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed575 MHz576 MHz
Boost clock speed625 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt182 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate25.0036.9 billion/sec
Floating-point performance800.0 gflops476.9 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB896 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortDual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon E8860 4.36
+38%
GTX 260 3.16

Radeon E8860 outperforms GeForce GTX 260 by 38% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon E8860 1686
+37.7%
GTX 260 1224

Radeon E8860 outperforms GeForce GTX 260 by 38% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 4.36 3.16
Recency 25 January 2014 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 182 Watt

The Radeon E8860 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 260

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E8860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 539 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.