ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI vs Radeon E8860

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking739not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.39no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameVenusRage 4
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 January 2014 (12 years ago)16 June 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed575 MHz90 MHz
Boost clock speed625 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Wattno data
Texture fill rate25.000.36
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs404
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz90 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s720.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2014 16 June 1999
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

Radeon E8860 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E8860 and All-In-Wonder 128 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E8860 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder 128 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI
All-In-Wonder 128 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon E8860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E8860 or All-In-Wonder 128 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.